On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 02:32:59 -0500, Lutger <lutger.blijdest...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Just for reference, this is the easy way to start fixing sites if you
don't know
where to begin:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http://d-programming-language.org/
The css validates 100%: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-
validator/validator?profile=css3&warning=2&uri=http://d-programming-
language.org/
I had a hell of a time trying to make DDOC generate valid documentation.
It has a lot of inconsistencies or just plain weird and non-uniform ways
to treat some standard macros. I had to resort to define macros with
invalid markup, and those, assembled together would end up creating valid
HTML 4.01 Strict documents. Ironic, I know. Maybe is that I just don't
understand well how DDOC works. Go figure.
Not to mention few weeks ago when I tried to generate valid XML/DocBook
files. I just gave up after a couple of hours. It's impossible. :(
--
Yao G.
