Name one?
If it wasn't for C++, there are plenty of other powerfull languages out
there.
--
Paulo
"so" <s...@so.do> wrote in message news:op.vkh2s0mg7dt...@so-pc...
Well, same goes for C++, year 2010 and we are not getting a standard gui
library (not saying it is necessary)
For the second part, C might owe its fame to Unix, i don't know it is
true
or not. But you have to admit it is a great language. Still there are
many
C programmers out there and i am sure they got their reasons to use it,
quite valid reasons. I would use it over any language out there if there
wasn't C++.
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:20:41 +0300, Paulo Pinto <pj...@progtools.org>
wrote:
Of course it did not require one.
On those days GUIs were rare, and if you want to develop for Unix, C
was
the only option.
C got famous because of Unix. C on its own would never had survived as
a
language.
"so" <s...@so.do> wrote in message news:op.vkhvb01i7dt...@so-pc...
I guess it is wording.
Hmm say...
Does Java come with a standard gui library? Yes.
Does C come with a standard gui library? No.
C didn't need a gui library to be successful, and didn't come with
one.
On the other hand Java/C# have to have one, packed, and they do come
with
(at least)one.
If your language has a "system programming" in its feature lists,
these
kind of libraries have very low priority, let alone specific IDE.
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 06:00:16 +0300, Jimmy Cao <jcao...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I'm not quite understanding your argument.
C and C++ do have *actual* IDE's for them, such as Visual Studio.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
