On 2010-12-19 03:13, Walter Bright wrote:
JRM wrote:you could write: sort!(@1>@2)(x);[...]I think this idea (or something similar) is worth consideration. It is simply a small extension to an already existing feature that would give D a terser syntax for lambda's than most of the other languages we've been discussing.but: sort!("a>b")(x); is just as short! And it already works.
Apparently it has several flaws as other have mentioned in this thread. -- /Jacob Carlborg
