bearophile wrote: > Jens Mueller: > > > I agree with bearophile. Unit testing can be implemented on top of the > > language and shouldn't be put into it. > > This is not what I have said. I was talking about option IV I have explained > here: > http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=107997
Not sure but is this compatible with your option IV: Built advanced unit testing capabilities on top of the existing ones in a module. You want to add hooks. If you just need them because right now some things cannot be implemented (e.g. because a unit test has no name) then we perfectly agree. There might be things in the current built-in unit testing that prevent implementing some advanced feature on top of them. That needs to be done. Jens