Jonathan M Davis: > Other changes that some people have expressed interest in are things like > having > it printed when a test passes, and those should not be in the language or > druntime itself. That's going to either have to be in helper functions that > are > run inside of unittest blocks or it's going to need to be possible to run > unittest blocks externally somehow
Few hooks may help. Built-in unit tests may call few things that are usually empty (the calls may contain a string with the unit test name, and other data). A unit test library is then free to fill those with code that shows statistics, prints, GUIs, etc. Bye, bearophile
