Re: std.unittests for (final?) review

[Andrej Mitrovic]

On 1/3/11, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> wrote:
> Other changes that some people have expressed interest in are things like
> having
> it printed when a test passes, and those should not be in the language or
> druntime itself.

Isn't this already done in Phobos?:

unittest
{
    debug(std_algorithm) scope(success)
        writeln("unittest @", __FILE__, ":", __LINE__, " done.");
}

--