Jens Mueller wrote:
Unit testing can be implemented on top of the
language and shouldn't be put into it. Somehow I have the feeling that
too often one tries to extend the language even though the feature could
be implemented in a library.
On the other hand, the built-in D unit test ability has been a huge success.
A unit test facility that is not used is worthless, no matter how capable it is.
The advantage of it being simple and built-in is it gets used, and I think
there's strong evidence that this is true for D.
