On 01/23/2011 09:13 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Agreed, but I will keep using an underscore after "is". Another reason why I do
so is, when used with camelcase, that little "is" capitalizes the next word
just to be consistent with the camelcase part of the naming conventions. When
we have an attribute of an object named 'ready', 'isReady()' doesn't match
because 'ready' doesn't match 'Ready'. An underscore makes it stay lowercased:

     is_ready();

The attribute can follow the camelcase rule and be consistent with the rest of
the names:

     is_lastItem();

You're right, it's a nice convention.
Deins
--
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com

Reply via email to