Okay, my fault. Didnt realize you were the author, and the project is
still active. The "2 years" came from here:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dcollections/browser/trunk/dcollections.
I thought, that "trunk" was the most recent version. Added a bookmark,
and will definitely take a closer look later. Thx for mentioning.
On 31.01.2011 19:09, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:48:06 -0500, Simon Buerger <k...@gmx.net> wrote:
On 31.01.2011 17:53, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dcollections
-Steve
Well, seems not bad on a quick look. But source is updated 2 years
ago, so I doubt it would compile with current dmd. Anyway, the topic
here is the std-behaviour of the std-lib. But sure, always nice to
have custom alternatives.
latest meaningful change was 4 months ago:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dcollections/changeset/102
It should compile on the latest DMD (if not, file a ticket). BTW, it
changes very little mostly because I haven't had many complaints about
it (maybe not a good sign?) and I haven't had much opportunity to use
it, as my day job does not allow using D unfortunately.
It was proposed as a possibility for the std lib, but Andrei and I
couldn't come to an agreement on what the collections should look
like. Ironically, his latest decision moves std.container closer to
dcollections in design.
However, it should be relatively compatible with phobos' container lib
(in fact RedBlackTree is a direct port of dcollections' version).
-Steve
