bearophile Wrote: > Simon Buerger: > > > * container should be named with respect to their use, not the > > implementation. "HashSet" is a bad name, because the user shouldnt > > care about the implemenation. > > This is good for a language like Python, or even Java, but for a system > language I want to know the algorithms I'm using under the hood. So I am not > sure.
There could be an interface named Set and various implementations of it, e.g. HashSet. I think this would be a good principle in general for all abstract collection types.
