On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 11:27 -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote: [ . . . ] > > Presumably this is a four-state vote: > > > > +1 approve > > 0 cannot decide > > -1 disapprove > > -- no opinion > > > > Anyone not emailing is deemed to have cast a -- vote all of which are > > automatically discarded. Votes such as +100 will presumably be > > renormalized to +1. > > All you really do is vote whether you want it in Phobos or not. The total > number > of votes/voters is then taken, and the majority decides. If the majority vote > for inclusion, then it's included. If the majority vote for it not to be > included, then it's not included. There's no weighting of votes or point > system > or whatnot.
I think we are saying fundamentally the same thing, but you are keeping it informal and I have started my Friday night whisky (*) drinking. I think I have already decided to say +1, but I better not say that in case it is deemed as trying to influence the electorate ;-) Have a good weekend! (*) Definitely not whiskey. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@russel.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
