On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:32:32 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > On 6/20/11 4:28 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: >> BTW has std.benchmark gone through the regular review process? > > I was sure someone will ask that at some point :o). The planned change > was to add a couple of functions, but then it got separated into its own > module. If several people think it's worth putting std.benchmark through > the review queue, let's do so. I'm sure the quality of the module will > be gained.
I think we should. Also, now that TempAlloc isn't up for review anymore, and both std.log and std.path have to be postponed a few weeks, the queue is open. :) -Lars