On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:21:57 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > On 6/21/11 1:58 AM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote: >> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:32:32 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >>> On 6/20/11 4:28 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: >>>> BTW has std.benchmark gone through the regular review process? >>> >>> I was sure someone will ask that at some point :o). The planned change >>> was to add a couple of functions, but then it got separated into its >>> own module. If several people think it's worth putting std.benchmark >>> through the review queue, let's do so. I'm sure the quality of the >>> module will be gained. >> >> I think we should. Also, now that TempAlloc isn't up for review >> anymore, and both std.log and std.path have to be postponed a few >> weeks, the queue is open. :) >> >> -Lars > > Perfect. Anyone would want to be the review manager? Lars? :o)
I would, but in two weeks I am going away on vacation, and that will be in the middle of the review process. Any other volunteers? -Lars