On 2011-07-13 07:28, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday 13 July 2011 06:12:58 Russel Winder wrote:
And, of course, I should have mentioned CMake and CMakeD.
The fact that I forgot, shows my prejudice against Makefile-based
systems and for direct DAG-based systems such as Gradle, SCons and Waf.
This though should not stop CMakeD being a part of this debate.
From previous discussions, it seems that one of the primary reasons for having
a D build tool in many people's minds is to also handle package management of
D libraries (like Haskell's cabal or rubygems for ruby). And as great as
cmaked, scons, gradle, waf, and other such tools may be, they don't do that.
- Jonathan M Davis
I don't agree with that. I think a build tool should deal with single
files and building. A package manager should deal with packages (of
files). In Ruby, RubyGems is the package manager and Rake is the build tool.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
