On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 09:29:45 +0100 Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can link to 2.8.4. and add more wrapper code in wxc so I can call > into 2.8.4. I don't know just how how different 2.9 is, if it's not > too different maybe I'll just jump straight to wrapping that. I'll be > doing this in a fork on github anyway so we'll see how that goes. OK. > As for SWIG, I guess I better explore that option first before I do > everything manually. I agree. > But I either have to fix some const issues in the > swig generator, or I'll have to let klickverbot know about it, or as a > last resort I'll use a version of an older compiler compatible with > swig output. Why not reporting it to klickverbot? > wxWidgets is a pretty big codebase, I don't know how well > swig will handle this (or how well I will handle swig).. Anyway I'll > see how it goes the next couple of days.. OK. When I get definite answer about which toolkit to use, I'll join you if it is going to be wx. ;) Sincerely, Gour -- When your intelligence has passed out of the dense forest of delusion, you shall become indifferent to all that has been heard and all that is to be heard. http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
