On 27/12/11 3:10 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/27/11 4:32 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
On 27/12/11 3:05 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/26/11 8:23 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
I am
not convinced that it can be used seamlessly without some relatively
large changes to the language.
I repeat that opDispatch and auto ref were invented for this, so
anything that doesn't work now is a bug. There are no changes needed to
the language, only fix the bugs :o).
How do you call template member functions of the held object without
changing opDispatch?
The idea is to pass the entire template instantiation as the string.
obj.foo!(bar, baz)(a, b);
->
obj.opDispatch!("foo!(bar, baz)")(a, b);
Andrei
I don't believe this will work in general when the template parameter
passed in requires name look-up in the local scope.
struct Foo
{
int bar(alias f)() { return f(); }
}
void main()
{
static int fun() { return 1; }
RefCounted!Foo foo;
writeln(foo.bar!fun()); // "fun" isn't in scope when mixed in.
}
