On 24/02/2012 11:03, David wrote:
Am 24.02.2012 11:43, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 2/23/2012 4:01 PM, F i L wrote:
Well then I disagree with Walter on this as well. What's wrong with
having a
"standard" toolset in the same way you have standard libraries? It's
unrealistic
to think people (at large) will be writing any sort of serious
application
outside of a modern IDE. I'm not saying it's Walters job to write IDE
integration, only that the language design shouldn't cater to the
smaller
use-case scenario.
Do you really want a language that the source code isn't readable or
browsable outside of an IDE?
Like the switch from command line to GUI, perhaps there are some that
are ready to switch from text files to some visually graphy thingy for
source code. But D ain't such a language. I don't know what such a
language would look like. I've never thought much about it before,
though I heard there was a toy language for kids that you "programmed"
by moving boxes around on the screen.
I think you mean Robot Karol, but this uses also a basic like syntax.
Sounds to me more like Scratch
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scratch_%28programming_language%29
A...
