I'm encouraged to see that every person in this thread so far seems to feel the same way as me regarding the syntax.
On 14 March 2012 05:25, Derek Parnell <ddparn...@bigpond.com> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:33:18 +1100, Kevin Cox <kevincox...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> (int i,,float f) = intBoringFloat(); >> > > For what its worth, the Euphoria Programming Language uses ? to signify > ignored values. > Yeah I tend to agree with that logic. I was quite liking the '_' that someone suggested much earlier in the thread: «x, _, int y» = intBoringFloat (); // Note: it seems to be unclear which brackets to use ;) Hey, the Japanese have some really cool brackets! 「x, _, int y」 = ... 〖x, _, int y〗 = ... 〘x, _, int y〙 = ... Tight! ;)