Re: Tuple unpacking syntax [Was: Re: Multiple return values...]

[RivenTheMage]

On Wednesday, 14 March 2012 at 02:33:29 UTC, Kevin Cox wrote:

Kind of unrelated but I think that it is important to have a way to ignore

values also.  Leaving them bank would sufice.

(int i,,float f) = intBoringFloat();

or

(int i, null, float f) = intBoringFloat();

or

(int i, void, float f) = intBoringFloat();