Le 05/04/2012 17:23, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
On 4/5/12 7:43 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I currently think DIP16 is invalid/worksforme (public imports allows
splitting a module into a package). All that is left is how we could
specifically import a package with one import statement.
Not entirely (I was aware of the way public import works). An issue does
exist - there are "too many names", i.e. the alias pulled in the
importing module and also the name being imported. This makes for odd
synonyms such as std.algorithm_package.sort.sort being the same as
std.algorithm.sort. The other issue is that obviously algorithm_package
and algorithm must have distinct names, which makes the scheme a bit
awkward at least until we define a compelling convention. I guess we can
live with all that.
Andrei
The first one isn't a problem. It isn't too many names, it is 2 names,
and it happen when explicitly told to do so.
The second is.
