On Monday, September 17, 2012 13:00:15 deadalnix wrote: > Don't take this wrong, I do know that this is a major breakage, and > would arm the language if applied in any short term manner. Still, > acknowledging error that have been made is usefull.
Not everyone agrees that an error _was_ made. There's a big difference between acknoweldging that non-nullable references could be useful and agreeing that having nullable references be the default was a bad idea. I very much that it will _ever_ happen that non-nullable references would be the default (certainly, it will _not_ happen in D2), even if they were added. - Jonathan M Davis
