On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 09:12 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > On 9/17/12 6:52 AM, deadalnix wrote: > >> Regardless, the solution at this point is going to be to add > >> std.typecons.NonNullable. It would be in there already, but the pull > >> request > >> with it needed more work, and it hasn't been resubmitted yet. > >> > > > > I don't think this is implementable as a lib in a satisfying way. > > It is, but it needs just a bit of language support in constructors. > Walter never got around to it.
Somewhat hypocritically as I cannot volunteer myself just now… just because Walter didn't get round to it, doesn't mean it can't be done. People who want the feature should find a way of creating the resource to make it happen. Four ways: volunteer to do the work themselves; club together to raise the cash to contract someone to do the work; get an organization to stump up a person to do the work; get an organization or seven to stump up cash to contract someone to do the work. There is nothing quite like providing a pull request to get things moving ;-) -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
