On 2012-09-24 07:01, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I think one of us is missing something, and I'm not entirely sure who.As I explained (perhaps poorly), the zero- and one-element tuples *would still be* tuples. They would just be implicitly convertible to non-tuple form *if* needed, and vice versa. Do you see a reason why that would *necessarily* not be the case?
Would that mean you could start doing things like: int a = 3; int b = a[0]; That feels very weird. -- /Jacob Carlborg
