At 03:03 PM 11/27/2005, you wrote: >Even if the ARRL adopts the more restrictive ARRL model ... I predict that >in the longer run we will ultimately get to the Canadian Model....
If I was forced to make a wager, that is where my money would go. We will have to see how the telegraphy testing rule pans out. That will tell us what type of regulatory environment the suites the FCC. They have refused to mode segregate 160 meters, they refused to set a maximum bandwidth for telephony, and they want to drop telegraphy proficiency testing. I think a trend is starting to show. I would expect some sort of omnibus re-alignment of part 97. 73, Mark N5RFX ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
