I have come to agree with you and Howard on this, John. We should
replace all of 97.221 with the following 27 words:
"No automatic station shall transmit on an already-occupied
frequency, or without identifying in 15 wpm CW at the beginning of
each 5 minute interval of operation."
Polite automatic stations can operate where they like. Control
operators for rude automatic stations will lose their licenses. No
sub-bands. No mercy.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> why would we re-do regulations which have been in effect for 50
years, or longer, allowing SSB down to 14100 and 7050 in Canada?
>
> Lately those regulations are no longer in effect but I have yet to
see anyone operating below those freq's, so far respecting the
> "gentleman's agreement" which is how our band plan is now run.
>
> I can't , for the life of me, understand why you guys keep getting
mired in the desire for more regulations, completely out of step
with the rest of the globe.
>
>
> John
> VE5MU
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: jgorman01
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 7:37 PM
> Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL proposal removes baud rate
limitations on HF
>
>
> As long as countries like Canada would redo their regulations and
> prevent stations from simply moving lower since it is legal to
so.
>
> Jim
> WA0LYK
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Danny Douglas" <n7dc@>
wrote:
> >
> > The exact reson we need INTERNATIONAL subbands.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "jgorman01" <jg6164@>
> > To: <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 3:09 PM
> > Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL proposal removes baud rate
> limitations on
> > HF
> >
> >
> > > The real problem right now is not expanding our SSB
segments, but
> > > rather that expansion forcing other countries SSB even lower.
> > > Canadian, Mexican, and Central American SSB stations are
already far,
> > > far down in the lower parts of 80m and 40m. So far in fact
that
> > > sometimes it is hard to have CW or PSK qso's. How many more
will show
> > > up if our SSB segments expand. Sometimes we forget we are
not the
> > > only hams in the world.
> > >
> > > Regardless of what is officially said, hams in other
countries are
> > > allowed to operate this low for only one reason, to avoid
qrm from US
> > > SSB stations. They will continue to do, making it harder
and harder
> > > for both CW and the narrow digital modes.
> > >
> > > Jim
> > > WA0LYK
> > >
> > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Danny Douglas" <n7dc@>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "KV9U" <mrfarm@>
> > > > To: <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 10:08 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL proposal removes baud
rate
> > > limitations
> > > > on HF
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Danny,
> > > > >
> > > > > Even if the CW subbands shrink, it does not mean that
there will
> > > be any
> > > > > shortage of spectrum for CW. From what I have read of the
> > > proposals, any
> > > > > narrow mode can always be used in a wider mode subband.
Just
> like you
> > > > > can today. No one loses anything. In fact, it is the
exact
> opposite
> > > > > because other hams will gain the privelege to use more
modes
> over a
> > > > > wider area. Particularly voice modes since they are the
> overwelmingly
> > > > > most popular modes and use the most bandwidth for a given
> amount of
> > > > > communication intelligence.
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to
Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
> > >
> > > Other areas of interest:
> > >
> > > The MixW Reflector :
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
> > > DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan
policy
> > discussion)
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.2/251 - Release
Date:
> 2/4/2006
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to
Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
>
> Other areas of interest:
>
> The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
> DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan
policy discussion)
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Ham radio Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply
> Icom ham radio Yaesu ham radio
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.0.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.2/251 - Release Date:
2/4/06
>
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
