There is something I am missing here.
Doesn't it seem like a good idea to get 35KHz more space for digital
modes, even if some part of the space can be used by the "automatic"
stations? I have to agree the 3600KHz upper end is a bit cramped.
Leigh/WA5ZNU
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 7:38 pm, kd4e wrote:
> What is the best means by which we may quickly encourage
> the FCC to *NOT* "stay their rule"?
>
> Sure would hate for them to do so based on representations
> of a few that it would be OK with the majority.
>
> Is there a preferred E-mail address at the FCC for such
> matters?
>
>> By Friday, there will be no non 97.221(c)(1) and (2) stations (fully
>> automatic or wide band semi-automatic) that will be operating on 80
>> meters in the U.S. since there will be no automatic subband available
>> ... unless the FCC stays their own new rule.
>>
>> 73, Rick, KV9U
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E
> ... in sunny & warm Florida :-)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Thank our brave soldiers this season:
> http://www.letssaythanks.com/Home1024.html
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> URL: bibleseven (dot) com
>
>
> Connect to telnet://cluster.dynalias.org a single node spotting/alert
> system dedicated to digital and CW QSOs.
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
