> When monitoring JT65A I decoded
> CQ  N4WO EL88     1 and 0
> What is the 1 and zero?
> Also what is the meaning of the # and * I see in the decoded lines?
> Dan

Hi Dan and fellow JT65 fans

You ask a very good question as understanding the meaning of these 
symbols is at the heart of digging deep into the noise to work the 
DX.

Here's an example decoded sequence for reference:

time   sync  Db  DT  DF  W  
002400 6     -23 2.5 223 23 * CQ VE7TIL CN89  1   0

The first few indicators WSJT provides labels and are easy to 
understand.  The * and # indicate whether the message is a call type 
message like the CQ above or something like DX1AA VE7TIL CN89...  
Now if DX1AA responds to me with VE7TIL DX1AA FB00 OOO then his 
message will be decoded with the mysterious # indicated.  

The # tells you the sync is reversed to indicate OOO! 

If you get a good sync on a message but not enough signal to decode 
it then you can still tell what your QSO partner is trying to send 
and know to keep trying!  This is critical on EME where everything 
is marginal.  Pay close attention the next time you're on the air 
and you'll see this in action and all will be self evident...

The 1 and 0 indicate 'which' decoder has decoded the message and as 
we'll see how confident the decoder is it got a good decode.

The 1 above indicates the Reed Soloman decoder decoded the message 
and is 100% sure of its contents.  Now if the message was corrupted 
by noise and QSB then you may see something like:
 
002400 6     -29 2.5 223 23 * CQ VE7TIL CN89  0   5

Note the Db level...

The above indicates the the Reed Soloman decoder failed (the first 
number changed to 0) and that the DEEP SEARCH decoder has a 50% (the 
range is given from 0-10) certainly the message was copied 
correctly.  In practice and my experience, if you see this then the 
message is almost certainly correct.  Infact, a ? will start to 
appear at really low confidence levels to indicate to the operator 
to suspect the decode and attempt another before accepting it. OR 
let it average up to a positive Reed Soloman decode over a few 
sequences.

The deep search decoder works by taking the callsign AND grid in the 
user input boxes on the left lower side of the screen and comparing 
the received data with that of the call3.txt database on your hard 
drive.  If there is a match a result like above is displayed and a 
confidence level given.  Therefore, you must actively maintain your 
call3.txt file and use the Radio to: and Grid: boxes...

Having gone this far lets talk about the average decoder...  You'll 
have likely noticed the 'little' window below the main decoder 
window.  This is the average window.  There are two rows for 1st and 
2nd period decodes to average up if you take my meaning.  Each time 
a sequence is decoded and if there was enough of a sync as set by 
the user, the message will be added to the average buffer.  If you 
manage the buffer (using clear aveage, include and exclude) actively 
you can pull VERY weak signals out of the ether that would have 
never been decoded on a single decode try and some may not be even 
visible on the waterfall!!!  I have worked many an EME single yagi 
station using this technique.  This is also where the # sign comes 
into practical use again.  If you decode this in the average window 
and nothing in the normal window:

002400 1 7/10 VE7TIL DX1AA FB00  1   0

Now look closely in the normal decode window and see if there is a # 
in the normal decode window then you know he's sending OOO your 
report and has copied both calls!!!  There could be no decoded text 
in the normal window so understanding this is giving you a great 
advantage during weak signal trys!

Finally the 7/10 in the average example above indicates that 10 seq 
where averaged and only 7 where meet the required sync level to be 
included in the average buffer. Again actively managing the average 
buffers is critical to working the weak ones...

I hope this answers your question Dan and you get so practical use 
out of this :-)

73 Scott
VE7TIL CN89lg

PS - I hope everyone sees that JT65 is not as automated as it first 
appears, it really does require a skilled operator who understands 
the software's capabilities and has the insight and skill to use 
them.  

Reply via email to