Jose, > maybe Tony could devise some measurements to compare them.
I'm not sure why, but on-air tests with ALE-400 seem to be a bit more robust than my path simulations indicate. Need to test this mode more. Tony -K2MO ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jose A. Amador" <ama...@electrica.cujae.edu.cu> To: <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 12:25 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] PSK-ARQ versus ALE-400 >I wonder what kind of "investment" is required. > > It has as many points as possible in common with sound card modes and > only requires MultiPSK as terminal program. > > If I am not asking for a comparison between apples and oranges (I am not > entirely convinced right now... 8-) ), maybe Tony could devise some > measurements to compare them. > > 73, > > Jose, CO2JA > > --- > > Andy obrien wrote: > >> While I have seen how well ALE 400 works, I am not convinced that it >> is worth the effort to invest in activity due to the lack of other >> hams using the mode. While ALE400 make sense to me, I can't see hams, >> en masse , switching to it. I still think that a better option would >> be the increased development of NBEMS PSK and MFSK with ARQ as >> implemented in FLDIGI. While perhaps not as robust as ALE 400 FAE , >> it is far more likely to be used by hams if there is more publicity >> about NBEMS. >> >> Andy K3UK > > VI Conferencia Internacional de Energía Renovable, Ahorro de Energía y > Educación Energética > 9 - 12 de Junio 2009, Palacio de las Convenciones > ...Por una cultura energética sustentable > www.ciercuba.com >
