On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Patrick Lindecker <f6...@free.fr> wrote:
> > > Hello Wes, > > I saw the test file. It is nice except the long suite of figures, which > could be a cause of possible systematic failure (with many errors following > a first error) . Better would be to keep only the call signs which include > figures and letters and produce a good diversity (and so a more precise > statistic result). > > Also it would be perhaps interesting to transmit the RTTY characters > through 2 different programs because a program could produce a not exactly > nominal RTTY transmission and its decoding could match this transmission > (for example, the stop must be 1.5 bits but can vary in fact). If, with two > different transmissions, the results are the same, they can be considered > as reliable. > > 73 > Patrick > Good suggestions, Patrick. I will get it done. But first I must go to a birthday party for my 6 year old Grandson! I have to have my priorities right... HI HI Wes, WZ7I
