--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Siegfried Jackstien" <siegfried.jackst...@...> wrote: > > <..> > > I follow the soft since February this year . on some days he uploaded 2 or 3 > versions >
Think about that again. And then look if this is a pro or a contra... [Think about cars that go back to the manufacturer to install a new steering column] <..> > > As he did not know the packet and pactor nets and who is on what qrg he > looked in the bandplans and so were the qrg settings > > He did not know it better so we should inform him what we need .. > You think, you say... but actually in the beginning of ROS frequencies were published only on the wordpress group. 14.112 was suggested then, and thus I made José and all the subscribers aware I was on that frequency with my WINMOR server [and two packet BBS right below and one pactor RMS right above QRG]. So he and all subscribers were aware months ago. I also made him aware of the RMS frequency list at winlink: http://www.winlink.org/RMSHFStatus As said: it seems José merely sees it from a technical perspective, and not from a HAM radio nor social perspective. I think this is the main cause for the problems. If he had invested more time in investigating the "target market" he is programming for, a lot could have been prevented. > I asked him for a distance calculator and in the next version it was there > And I asked him to stick to one frequency... and he made three! ;-) Sigi, are you aware of WSPR? http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/
