Hi,

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:39:36AM +0000, vince wrote:
> Ive been working on trying to improve the performance of directfb 1.3.0
> on the arm platform. The attached patch will replace the default libc
> memcpy with a faster implementation. Ive tested this patch using an
> AT91RM9200, but should work on other ARM targets.

What libc implementation are you based on? I'm wondering if if would
make more sense to replace memcpy entirely for the whole system in case
the native implementation is not as good.

uClibc, for example, has an optimized routine for memcpy:

  
http://sources.busybox.net/index.py/trunk/uClibc/libc/string/arm/_memcpy.S?revision=22064&view=markup


Daniel

_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
directfb-dev@directfb.org
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev

Reply via email to