Friday, May 17, 2002, 5:03:33 PM, Derek J. Balling wrote: > At 2:02 PM -0700 5/17/02, wxWeb.com wrote: >>Friday, May 17, 2002, 12:20:58 PM, Derek J. Balling wrote: >> >>> Well, unless someone has copious free time on their hands, it doesn't >>> look like any mating of our data with SRS will take place any time >>> soon. Even though we've got a couple thousand .(com|net|org) domains >>> that are misregistered[1] domains, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wants an >>> individual e-mail message for each one, along with a description of >>> "why you think a particular address or phone number might be >>> wrong"... that means that even if it's patently obvious (1600 >>> Pennsylvania Ave, DC.... 1060 W. Addison, Chicago, IL.... >>> 212-555-1212, etc.), it would still require me to explain it in >>> monosyllabic terms to the compliance-monkeys. >> >>Sounds like a good way to deter someone from submitting frivolous >>complaints that would cost the registrars a lot of money and time to >>investigate. >> >>I'd require more, myself. A $5 fee per requested investigation for >>example, refunded if the investigation turns out to be justified, >>forfeited if the data ends up being materially correct.
> Would you support the same type of program for, say, abuse complaints > to an ISP? If not, expound upon me the difference between the two? That's simple. You are comparing apples and oranges. The two have nothing in common. One is because of something affirmatively that a user did that may have caused harm to a third party, the other is for doing nothing except providing incorrect information into a database. The two are not even similar, nor is the relationship between the isp/user and registrar/registrant close enough to draw a proper analogy. -- Best regards, William X Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- OpenSRS installation and customizations Payment Processing Integration Apache Installation and Support Services http://www.wxsoft.com/
