Friday, May 17, 2002, 8:04:31 PM, Derek J. Balling wrote: >>I would generally agree with your statements. I would just put forward >>that having a reason for a challenge is an important necessary >>distinction. All of the situations you outline below would qualify by my >>standards as valid requests for challenging.
> I guess my position is "isn't the fact that the data is wrong > justification enough to get the registar to act upon it?" And that is a subjective call, and my position is that your assertions that it is wrong are not justification, even if you claim the evidence is obvious, because even the most obvious would require investigation and consume man hours unnecessarily, unless there is a pressing need for the information to be corrected. It simply being false is not the pressing need. -- Best regards, William X Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- OpenSRS installation and customizations Payment Processing Integration Apache Installation and Support Services http://www.wxsoft.com/
