O.K., so is everyone now in agreement that there is no legal problem embedding a font that explicitly licenses itself to be embedded?
I am new here and am a bit mystified at the way discussion seems to move, with inapposite answers to comments and then the point gets lost along the way. This https://www.adobe.com/type/browser/info/embedding.html Adobe page lists the four levels of permissions granted (or not, as the case may be) by a font's license. (However, according to http://forums.adobe.com/thread/634966?decorator=print&displayFullThread=true this forum discussion , "installable embedding" is only a theoretical, not a practical option for lack of any software that actually performs this. Legal matters aside, I like the idea of an online font repository and downloading from there as needed. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RE-tdf-discuss-Re-Feature-request-embed-font-tp2706681p2710940.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
