On 8 Jun 2011, at 23:49, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Simon Brouwer wrote: > >> Op 6-6-2011 11:37, toki schreef: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 05/06/2011 15:00, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>>> A formal, legal foundation. The ASF is a recognized 501(c)3, non- >>> TDF might not have 501(c)(3) status, but then consider that it is >>> incorporated in Germany, not the United States. >> That 501(c)(3) status aside, is TDF actually a legally established >> foundation (yet)? > > I also think that 'independent' is also an adjective that belongs > there... being independent is quite important to a number > of FOSS ecosystem people...
While that is clearly a true statement, you seem to be implying that you don't think TDF is "independent". Please can you explain what you mean? Thanks. S. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
