Update: my public policy prof put a smiley face next to the cc-by license statement on a paper I got back today!
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Rob Myers <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/18/2010 08:26 PM, Karl Fogel wrote: >> >> One thought: instead of simply an exhortation to use a "Creative Commons >> license", be explicit about using a free license (i.e., CC-BY or >> CC-BY-SA). > > http://freedomdefined.org/ > >> It's *amazing* how often people say their stuff is "CC licensed" but >> don't know which license they used -- and very often it's an NC or ND >> license, hence non-free. Or they are aware they used an NC or ND >> license, but say they licensed their work as "open source". My rough >> impression (shared by colleagues here at QCO) is that this tendency to >> blend all CC licenses together is by far the common case. > > http://robmyers.org/weblog/2010/11/name-that-license.html > > ;-) > > - Rob. > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss > -- http://www.madebyparker.com _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
