Would you mind sharing that paper so I can get an idea of how to lay things
out?

(Also, if anyone can enlighten me on where to place the Chinese version of
the license on Chinese language documents, I'd appreciate it since that's
most of what I'm producing these days)

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Parker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Update: my public policy prof put a smiley face next to the cc-by
> license statement on a paper I got back today!
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Rob Myers <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 11/18/2010 08:26 PM, Karl Fogel wrote:
> >>
> >> One thought: instead of simply an exhortation to use a "Creative Commons
> >> license", be explicit about using a free license (i.e., CC-BY or
> >> CC-BY-SA).
> >
> > http://freedomdefined.org/
> >
> >> It's *amazing* how often people say their stuff is "CC licensed" but
> >> don't know which license they used -- and very often it's an NC or ND
> >> license, hence non-free.  Or they are aware they used an NC or ND
> >> license, but say they licensed their work as "open source".  My rough
> >> impression (shared by colleagues here at QCO) is that this tendency to
> >> blend all CC licenses together is by far the common case.
> >
> > http://robmyers.org/weblog/2010/11/name-that-license.html
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> > - Rob.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.madebyparker.com
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
>



-- 
Alec Story
Cornell University
Biological Sciences, Computer Science 2012
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss

Reply via email to