Thanks, Rob! I'm convinced! Add Rob's article as a citation to the claim about share-alike being distinct from copyleft please!
-- Aaron Wolf wolftune.com On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Rob Myers <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07/08/13 10:59 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote: > >> Congratulations on superb work so far!! >> > > Yes! > > > This phrase: >> "The term ‘share-alike’ is broader than copyleft: it includes copyleft, >> but also non-FLO licences that require adaptations to be released under >> the same licence as the original." >> >> I do not think that is accurate at all. >> > > I wrote about this here (despite the title it covers SA as well as NC-SA): > > http://robmyers.org/2008/02/**24/noncommercial-sharealike-** > is-not-copyleft/<http://robmyers.org/2008/02/24/noncommercial-sharealike-is-not-copyleft/> > > - Rob. > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freeculture.org/**mailman/listinfo/discuss<http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss> > FAQ: > http://wiki.freeculture.org/**Fc-discuss<http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss> >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
