Language can express our ideas and ideals in a way that's readily
understood and inclusive to the general population, or it can isolate
us in a world of specialized jargon. A decision should be made about
which is most important to the group -- promoting a broader
understanding, or inventing language that better satisfies the needs
of the specialist.

I'm for the former, and I think that's in line with the founding
principles of this group. But it's not a "right or wrong"
decision, just a decision. And like all decisions, it has
consequences.

I agree with Mark: "These definitions will be the building blocks to
our message. Our audience will not have the same opportunity for
dialog or background. The message will need to be clear simple and
normalized."


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=24685


________________________________________________________________
*Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah*
February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA
Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/

________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to