On Nov 13, 2008, at 5:49 AM, James Page wrote:

The point I am trying to make is that Activity Theory output is the activity
and actions of individuals.

The Persona acts as a stereotype between real users and the designer.

There may be a problem with Activity Theory been dry. One can see from
this discussion that people don't understand it. But the advantage that it
has got is that it has got a theory. And it is based on the behaviour
of individuals.

Activity Theory has allot of problems, and don't think it is ideal, but at
least it does have a theory to back it self up with.

And how is activity theory incompatible with persona creation and dissemination?

(the other) Jared


________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to