I'm in the 'absolutely not' column. The proposal is too airy-fairy
impractical with overtly political items ('carbon neutral', for
example) thrown in.
The United States is dealing with huge problems that would not have
been helped by 'design thinking'. And the last thing we need is
more levels of bureaucracy with random cabinet level positions.
#6 alone would cost millions in taxpayer dollars--and to what end?
The only item in the list worth supporting is #2, as I think we've
all been faced with impenetrable government forms that appeared to
have been written by an English-Jibberish-English retranslator.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=38901
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
