I was stating my opinion Christian. Richard was trying to state that X is better than Y, the pretext of which is that doing both is a waste of time. This was exemplified by him saying I don't want to go to 3 smaller conferences. As if to say, the choices are the problem.
If I would Richard, I would just do it. Create the conference that you want. Examples of a unified vision of UX conference are already there: UX Challenge, UX London and UX Australia are all happening this year, no? Yes, hey are smaller than 1500 and none are in the US, but they do fit the bill of a unified UX conference and all have their positive and negative sides. The two more open conferences, really look exciting actually. But yes, I would stand in agreement with your call to do both and that there is no conflict between doing both. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=40611 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... disc...@ixda.org Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
