A wider rating system might be biased a) in favour of famous people, b) against static prototypes whose working needs to be explained in text (rather: in favour of slick and expensive presentations regardless of idea quality), or c) ideas that are. How will ideas that have never been rated (ie, just passed over and not voted on because no one was interested) be treated? Will they be forgotten or dragged up again in the future until enough people do vote?
Sorry if I sound skeptical - I'm not really - but I'm aware that crowd mentality doesn't always work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=40926 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... disc...@ixda.org Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
