On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Yves Dorfsman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm assuming that all those activities will be opt-in, in which case, what > drawback could there be to be for all-LOPSA(1)? What advantage is gained > from creating this "virtual" entity? Most people find it easier to fit into a smaller, more "local" (fsvo) structure than a larger national one; the larger one feels more remote/distant on a conceptual level. Yes, you can argue that on some level it's a waste of resources or yadayadayada to do this stuff on a different level. No, such argument is not going to have any effect whatsoever on people, who stubbornly persist in being driven by impulses that favor local/more focused groups instead of being the perfectly reasoning creatures we'd all like them to be. I would suggest accepting what is instead of trying to force the issue; it's how people are "wired". -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates [email protected] [email protected] unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
