Well, for a local chapter, you have the "hallway track" around the meetings.

But to have physical meetings, you have to have a place to meet, arranging a place to meet has a lot of overhead, and requies signatures and monitary commitments (if only in terms of insurance).

To be able to say who is able to sign what, a Chapter organization is formed. To protect LOPSA, it also requires knowing that there are enough people to mitigate these costs and not bog down the national org.

so for normal chapters, there are lots of reasons to ahve a formal Chapter, Chapter Officers, dues, etc.

This is why the LOPSA by-laws have the specific definition.

For what's being discussed, I'm in agreement that invoking the work "Chapter" and therefor all the by-laws and other administrivia overhead that comes with it will produce very little benefit (if any) and will eat up time that could be better spent providing the service that is being proposed (which, like other posters is something I would like to see)

David Lang

On Fri, 9 May 2014, Paul Graydon wrote:

I have to say I'm with dballing here.  If Chapter comes with a whole bunch of 
overhead, based on existing lopsa by-laws why bother having this as a chapter?  
What is the tangible benefit?  That's what people aren't really answering.  
You're focussing on what benefit the end product will have, the actual content 
which *everyone* so far is in agreement that it would be great.

What is the advantage of it being a "Chapter"?

Worse still, if the by-laws require this to be handled through the locals 
committee, and they'll have to spend time working out how to fit it in to a 
framework that wasn't really created with the concept of a virtual chapter in 
mind... why do we want the locals committee to have to spend their time doing 
that, unless there is an explicit benefit to be gained in having this exist as 
a chapter?

On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 01:35:04PM -0400, Derek Balling wrote:
   I think I've made it clear I'm not bashing the idea. I *love* the idea,
   I've said so before a number of times now.
   I'm just saying not to focus on "Chapter" (which, per the LOPSA by-laws,
   has a very specific definition and set of requirements) and just focus on
   "The Content".
   D
   On May 9, 2014, at 1:32 PM, john boris <[email protected]> wrote:

     "Chapters", "Hangouts", Meetups, beer bashes, call it whatever you want.
     Martin is just trying to work within our current structure. We are in a
     technology that is constantly changing the landscape and the language.
     So in the onset they are called Virtual Chapters but later they may be
     called something else. At least he is trying to do something to stay
     with the times and the Technology. Why beat him up or trash the idea.
     The idea of this is that a "Virtual" Anything is what he is looking for
     and someone in the group to stand up and say "Yes I will do that"

     On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Derek Balling <[email protected]>
     wrote:

       I feel like I can't stay out of this.
       Why do I need a chapter to schedule hangouts at 7ET, while Mario[1]
       schedules some hangouts for 7PT? And if Doug Hughes[2] decides he's
       staying up late tonight, he can "attend" Mario's 7PT session, even
       though he's on the east coast.
       Again - you're talking about something that needs organizers, but not
       necessarily "chapters".
       D
       [1] I'm not volunteering Mario. :-)
       [2] Nor do I believe Doug Hughes would ever stay up late. He's like
       the crotchety old man asleep by 8, get off my lawn.
       On May 9, 2014, at 1:21 PM, john boris <[email protected]> wrote:

         The one advantage I see to having multiple Virtual Chapters is time
         zones. So an organizer on the West coast decides to hold the
         meetings at 8 PM. That is 11 PM on the East coast. Also with
         Multiple Virtual Chapters there could be multiple "Meetings" and
         people could then flock to the one that is most convenient to their
         schedule.

         On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Pamela Lynn Howell
         <[email protected]> wrote:

           IMO, what is actually needed is the *organizer* for the virtual
           chapter, whatever it may be called.
           ---p

           On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Derek Balling
           <[email protected]> wrote:

             On May 9, 2014, at 12:14 PM, Evan Pettrey <[email protected]>
             wrote:

               I think you're being a bit pedantic here and I'm not sure it
               is necessary or beneficial to the discussion.

             I completely disagree. To ME, IMHO, going through this "virtual
             chapter" process is an unnecessary use of the scarce resource we
             have called "time".
             I think what he's talking about DOING is great. I think
             scheduling regular hangouts, etc., is a great thing for LOPSA
             members to have and participate in. I think consuming his time,
             the locals committee's time, etc., creating such a "chapter",
             however, is completely wasted. It smells of the type of
             "planning to plan" type of stuff that bogs down volunteer
             groups.
             What does he want? Social/technical/learning experiences with
             other LOPSA members who aren't geographically proximal? So make
             that happen, set up the schedule for the hangouts, etc., but
             don't get bogged down in all the details of the Locals policy,
             like figuring who the "chapter members" of record are, who allow
             the chapter to maintain its charter, etc., etc.   Just schedule
             and advertise the hangouts and let any member who wants to be
             involved be involved.
             Every expense of scarce volunteer time should have an actual net
             beneficial outcome. Spending time on the virtual-chapter portion
             of this project doesn't do that. (Spending time on the "meat" of
             this project has plenty of benefits, obviously).
             I've said my piece, at this point.  We're all grown-ups and can
             make our own life choices. :-)
             D
             _______________________________________________
             Discuss mailing list
             [email protected]
             https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
             This list provided by the League of Professional System
             Administrators
              http://lopsa.org/

           _______________________________________________
           Discuss mailing list
           [email protected]
           https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
           This list provided by the League of Professional System
           Administrators
            http://lopsa.org/

         --
         John J. Boris, Sr.
         Online Services
         www.onlinesvc.com

     --
     John J. Boris, Sr.
     Online Services
     www.onlinesvc.com

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to