For Dun & Bradstreet, we have something similar to your IT fellow (we call it “distinguished engineer”). Traditionally, as you rise up through the organization and begin to take on more responsibilities, one of those is managing people. For me, that’s what I want. I have been extremely technical but I want to share, mentor, and grow others. For some of the guys on my team, they could care less. They are an awesome engineers (/sysadmins/geeks/whatever), but in a normal situation would plateau on the pay scale because the next level for them is management. Distinguished engineer adds additional pay scales (for those with Army experience, kind of like Specialist vs. Corporal). It comes with a little more juice as well, but more as a add-on than a goal. The goal is to reward people for their performance.
--------------------------------- Mark Honomichl "Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid." > On Jun 9, 2015, at 08:52, Tim Kirby <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not sure if this is actually a repeat of past threads, we > spend a lot of time talking about this sort of thing within > "IT organizations" but I'm not sure I've seen this one. > > $WORK is a computer system manufacturer. Thus it is largely > technical with an R&D component building software and hardware. > Within our IT organization we have two or three highly > experienced sysadmin/devop/engineer types that could hold > their own against any of the R&D "Principal Engineers" and > do, at time, consult for R&D. > > The politics and handling of "IT" is every bit as dysfunctional > as you might expect, however, and the job titles and "official > status" of these IT guys make them almost indistinguishable > from a front line help desk tech (no, I'm not dissing the help > desk tech, don't go there). > > I am interested in hearing from anyone who works with or has > worked with companies that have actually recognized such > senior folks within their organizations. One term I've heard > the term "IT Fellow", but I'm really not hung up on the name > so much as the perceived role within the company and how such > people might appear in the company ranks. > > I suppose I should add that the "VP of Administration" who is > the ersatz CIO (in terms of corporate position) denies all > CIO responsibility, indicating that the Director of IT, his > immediate report, has all IT responsibility. There is an > "Office if the CTO", I don't know if it would be possible to > hang these highly senior IT people off that instead. I do > realize that the de-emphasis of IT at the VP level probably > means we're all screwed. Sigh. > > Thanks for any input... > > Tim > -- > Tim Kirby [email protected] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators > http://lopsa.org/
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
