+1 million. I wish I had the time to learn that skill.

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015, 11:13 Stephen Potter <[email protected]> wrote:

> Several others have already mentioned that it sounds like there's
> management problems at several levels and titles won't help.  Some have
> mentioned the split management/technical track with management roles
> such as Lead, Supervising, Managing, etc and technical advancement
> through Distinguished, Principal, Fellow, etc titles.
>
> What I see as the underlying problem is that no one has been able to
> relate what IT does to the business goals and values to help the
> executives really understand where IT fits.  You mention that IT falls
> under the VP of Administration, which generally contains groups like
> real estate, facilities, logistics, HR, and perhaps regulatory
> compliance.  This is all just overhead and costs of doing business.
> None of these have anything to do with revenue and enabling the business.
>
> If you really want IT to start to get some respect, you need to have
> someone who can talk the language of the executives and tie their goals
> into what IT can provide.  Business will talk about market share
> (acquiring/retaining customers), competitive differentiation, business
> innovation, and profitability.  You need someone who can take those and
> show how IT can help develop multichannel (buzzword: omni-channel)
> services that provide competitive differentiation and attract new
> customers.  Someone needs to talk about continuous delivery of IT
> services that enable other business units (R&D, sales, etc) to change
> the way they do business (mobility, supply chain management, etc) and
> speed up sales (buzzword: "inventory turn", "sales close cycle") or even
> enable entirely new products and services (buzzword: "time to market",
> "go-to-market strategy"). And, finally, you need to be able to show how
> IT can help reduce costs across the entire company (not just reducing IT
> costs), reducing SG&A (sales, general, and administration), and how the
> other things I've already mentioned can reduce unit costs (development
> cycle, manufacturing costs, etc).
>
> A couple of examples I can think of, which wouldn't necessarily be
> relevant to your specific company.  One large fashion retailer I worked
> with used to ship store layout, discount information and sales reports
> to each of its several thousand stores weekly.  They were spending
> hundreds of thousands of dollars a month on FedEx shipping alone.  IT
> was able to work with the store operations teams to figure out how all
> that information could be safely shared through remote access across the
> network.  The savings to the company was millions per year.
>
> Another company had dozens of desktops in their distribution facility
> where product pickers went to print off pick lists for packaging and
> shipping.  The conditions in the DF were such that the desktops and
> printers crashed regularly, requiring pickers to search for a working
> desktop/printer combination, and slowing them down. IT had a person
> onsite in the DF full time, just to handle desktop/printer issues.
> Orders were batched every couple of hours, so there were often times
> when the pickers had nothing to do.  IT was able to work with
> distribution to come up with a combination of thin-clients, touch
> screens, and tablets that enabled more real time access to the lists,
> reduced errors, reduced outages (to the point they pulled the IT guy
> back to the office and redeployed him to do higher value activities),
> and reduced costs.  It also enabled the distribution to collect
> efficiency data, which subsequently led to re-arranging how products
> were stored in the DF.
>
> In order for IT to get respect in many companies, there needs to be a
> strong leader who can tie IT to the business, rather than just being
> another SG&A cost.
>
> -spp
>
> On 6/9/2015 9:52 AM, Tim Kirby wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this is actually a repeat of past threads, we
> > spend a lot of time talking about this sort of thing within
> > "IT organizations" but I'm not sure I've seen this one.
> >
> > $WORK is a computer system manufacturer. Thus it is largely
> > technical with an R&D component building software and hardware.
> > Within our IT organization we have two or three highly
> > experienced sysadmin/devop/engineer types that could hold
> > their own against any of the R&D "Principal Engineers" and
> > do, at time, consult for R&D.
> >
> > The politics and handling of "IT" is every bit as dysfunctional
> > as you might expect, however, and the job titles and "official
> > status" of these IT guys make them almost indistinguishable
> > from a front line help desk tech (no, I'm not dissing the help
> > desk tech, don't go there).
> >
> > I am interested in hearing from anyone who works with or has
> > worked with companies that have actually recognized such
> > senior folks within their organizations. One term I've heard
> > the term "IT Fellow", but I'm really not hung up on the name
> > so much as the perceived role within the company and how such
> > people might appear in the company ranks.
> >
> > I suppose I should add that the "VP of Administration" who is
> > the ersatz CIO (in terms of corporate position) denies all
> > CIO responsibility, indicating that the Director of IT, his
> > immediate report, has all IT responsibility. There is an
> > "Office if the CTO", I don't know if it would be possible to
> > hang these highly senior IT people off that instead. I do
> > realize that the de-emphasis of IT at the VP level probably
> > means we're all screwed. Sigh.
> >
> > Thanks for any input...
> >
> > Tim
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
>  http://lopsa.org/
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to