Slack costs a lot more than someone is accounting for. Even paid annually, it's a pretty penny for premium.
Saying one would cover it out of dues is a stretch. Don't feed the trolls? --e On Jul 12, 2015 7:05 PM, "Adam Moskowitz" <[email protected]> wrote: > Allan Irving wrote: > > if some of you here would review what Slack offer as premium . . . you > > would find security surpasses this mailing list. > > Again: This list was set up to be open, archived, and searchable; there > was never any requirement for security. Anyone may join, and anyone -- > including people who are not members of the list -- may read the > archives. We know email isn't secure; we knew that when this list was > set up, but for this particular application, that lack of security is OK. > > > Slack . . . premium (well covered in members dues) > > For LOPSA to spend money requires action on the part of the Board of > Directors, not just a discussion on this list. If you think LOPSA should > spend money on Slack, you would need to make a proposal to the Board -- > one that included a cost-benefit analysis; if you can't show that spending > money on Slack to replace the existing mailing lists is 1) good for the > organization and 2) better than the other likely uses of LOPSA's (limited) > funds, you proposal is unlikely to be adopted. > > Adam > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators > http://lopsa.org/ >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
