Goodsounds;473295 Wrote: > If participants got software to keep for no payment, then that is free, > isn't it? Did they also say it was non-taxable? > > If I understand you, are you thinking about the fact that hardware > can't be tested unless it is provided? That's right. What would make it > taxable is that the tester can keep it. > > If the testers sign paperwork beyond a non-disclosure agreement, it > might mention that they receive the unit in return for testing. Or maybe > no mention is made. > > Perhaps one of the Radio or Touch program participants could comment?
Yes it was definitely free; I'm not sure why I quoted it. I don't recall exactly what they said; I think it was along the lines that if it was below $600 for the year it didn't need to be reported for taxes. I suspect they weren't clear on that meaning that THEY didn't need to report it versus what I was suppose to do. They were definitely tracking the value of the software and whether or not my total for the year had exceeded $600. -- jdoering ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jdoering's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17482 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=69819 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
