keithleng wrote:
okay. My last comment on the "enthusiastic amateur" remark. I'm sure
there are some very talented people working on the SB. People who are,
or could easily become, "professionals" if they so desired. I also feel
that there will be people who are contributing/have contributed to the
project who do not fall into that category.
... who are managed by people who *do* fall into that category.
My remarks were based solely on my perception of the software. I do not
feel that it is anywhere near as robust as one is entitled to expect of
software bundled with a piece of expensive audio equipment.
It's extremely good audio equipment that revolutionises how you listen
to your music collection, but it sure as hell isn't expensive.
> I believe
that if this software had designed, managed and built in-house by, say,
Apple, it would be a lot better than it is today.
Ever used iTunes? Apple have released some really bum versions of that,
particularly for Windows.
This is not intended as a troll. It's the opinion I would give if a
friend considering buying a SB were to ask me my opinion. I would love
to be able to say that it's given me hours of trouble-free enjoyment.
Unfortunately, that is not the case.
You are one of the unfortunate few who are experiencing major problems
with this product. The vast majority of users get up and running with
little or no problem.
However, so far you've given us very little detail of your environment
(server platform, version of slimserver, network hardware, wired or
wireless, etc. etc.)
Why not describe your problems in more detail and people will try to
help you fix them?
R.
--
http://robinbowes.com
If a man speaks in a forest,
and his wife's not there,
is he still wrong?
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
